Monthly Archives: May 2009

Culture Eating (defeating) Strategy (book review transforming your leadership culture)

A leader will be noticed when there is a need to change and people want a change. Leadership can be constrained by culture or the company’s character (for readers of the Breaktrhough company). This blog is very articulate that leaders should be aware of their context (culture amongst others), connect to it and start acting. Nice read for leaders who adapt the CCCCC-principles!!

Source: http://www.leadershipnow.com/leadingblog/2009/05/culture_eats_strategy.html Posted by Michael McKinney at 12:37 28/5/2009

You’re so busy grasping technology in one hand and science in the other, you have no hand left to grasp what’s really important. It’s the human spirit, that’s the challenge, that’s the voice, that’s the expedition.

—John Travolta as George Malley in the film Phenomenon
Transforming Your Leadership Culture

To create transformation change in an organization you need to change the culture. This may seem to go without saying, but we often try to make changes without changing the underlying belief systems. Belief systems drive behavior. In Transforming Your Leadership Culture, authors John McGuire and Gary Rhodes write, “Organizational culture holds your organization’s aspirations and the spirit of the place. Its beliefs and values define the organization’s core.” To illustrate how endemic the force of belief is within a culture, they relate the following example:

Mike, a vice president at National Bank, a prestigious financial organization, tells the story of what came out of an all-day meeting of a group of vice presidents at headquarters: “We brought in VPs and directors from all our locations. We needed to use the largest conference room in the building and had to get special permission to do so.”

At National Bank, “permission” wasn’t simply an issue of scheduling. The large conference room was located on the top floor of the building and used exclusively by senior executives, not by vice presidents. The vice president and director offices were on the floors below; lower-ranked employees were lower still, filling in the middle floors; the ground level housed administrative and support operations. The furnishings in the building changed by floor too. The top floor featured leather chairs, high-quality wood desks and tables, artwork, and attractive kitchen and washroom facilities. Below that level, floors housed progressively less expensive furnishings.

The night before the meeting, Mike was working late in his office finishing up his presentation: “A couple guys from our maintenance staff kept walking past my office with chairs from the meeting room down the hall. I didn’t think much of it until the next morning when I arrived on the top floor for our big meeting. The maintenance staff had replaced all the leather chairs from our floor.”

Here the power of the culture reveals itself: no one had told the maintenance staff to trade out the chairs. There was no policy or precedent for doing so. The maintenance crew made its own decision, based on its understanding that certain chairs went with certain levels of status. Without question, they simply followed the cultural norm. The cultural authority and trappings of status were so embedded in the organization that it didn’t even occur to them that vice presidents might sit in executive chairs while meeting on the executive floor.

“Change won’t take hold in operations without change in culture to back it up” say McGuire and Rhodes.

Understanding organizational culture, why it persists, how to change it, and where that change begins is the subject of their book. What beliefs are undermining your change effo

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Oops, remarkable art is it not! Suzan E Evans and Amo Mirella 05/29/2009

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

On the relationship between KM and culture

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Thinking about principles for effective knowledge transfer

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

People Are indeed the Focus of Enterprise 2.0

Often stated (amongst others on this blog). It is about people and processes for 80%. Technology will not lead (is not allowed) to dominate these massive changes!! Post reflects on this!

Source:http://www.collabo.com/people-are-the-focus-of-enterprise-20 Author unknown

Running a company in today’s ever-changing environment requires a more fluid approach to problems and the ability to test solutions through trail and error methods. A company that exists within a fixed vertical structure prevents profiting from the true value of it’s human capital. “There is never an ideal process or system and there will always be exceptions,” says Experience Design Strategist Paula Thornton. The true essence of Enterprise 2.0 is in focusing on optimizing systems around the way people work, not molding people around systems.
One key element of Enterprise 2.0 is simplifying business processes. Rather than creating complex linear paths, the idea is to empower employees with versatile tools that can adjust to changing conditions. Looking towards IT to cultivate these tools, companies tend to rely heavily on code developers when there needs to be an increased emphasis on interface designers. There should be “a 1-to1 ratio of developers and designers. They’re two totally different kinds of mindsets — and while there are unique individuals who can do both, it’s rare,” says Thornton.
Enterprise 2.0 banks on social computing principles which foster sharing knowledge and ideas with transparency, persistence, and accessibility.
Source: Enterprise 2.0 Isn’t a Checklist
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Oops, remarkable art is it not ! It is Paul Silka 05/28/2009

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Business Process Management and Enterprise 2.0

Source:http://www.bluethots.com/2009/05/28/business-process-management-and-enterprise-20

Posted by Sean Lew on Thursday, 28 May, 2009

I have previously thought that these two concepts do not sit well together as Enterprise 2.0 is freeform and allows users to do as they please. In the world wide web, this could work as there are so many people out there fixing up things that are not right on Wikipedia. However, within an organisation resources are scare and time is money. Organisations do not have the luxury of having a huge army of editors internally to fix up and garden the Enterprise 2.0 platform. If this is a problem, what is the solution?

I personally believe that BPM (Business Process Management) could play a role in this. I am not saying that free-formness should be thrown out of the window. What I am saying is that some levels of BPM could help to improve the quality of the information and data on the platform. The processes involved should enable and not restrict people from editing and creating content. I believe it should be light weight and adaptable to any kind of content as well.

What I envisage is as follows:

1) Generic template for all content created.

2) Content review over time and updates

3) Usage of links and data from other sources

4) Workflows in teams and projects to ensure up to date information

5) Overall manager for each work space and would be held accountable for the space

Does all these make sense? Please let me know your thoughts.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 52 other followers