Monthly Archives: June 2009
Is Enterprise 2.0 Just for Knowledge workers
Posted by fredzimny
Thought inspired by this found post. Enterprise 2.0 is about open communication in and outside organizations. It’s scope can indeed be knowledge but also information or wisdom. For me an essential part of any 2.0 concept is the randomness of an encounter (in a netwok) and the lost relevance of relationships. Great post to reflect on and start acting accordingly!
http://blog.spigit.com/Blog/View?blogid=105&blogentryid=125 by H Pritchett 29/6/2009
A knowledge worker in today’s workforce is an individual that is valued for their ability to interpret information within a specific subject area. They will often advance the overall understanding of that subject through focused analysis, design and/or development.
As the Wikipedia definition above describes, knowledge work is interpretative, analytical and creative. Its fuel is information, and interactions with others around ideas and projects. It’s why Enterprise 2.0 is such a good fit for knowledge work.
The premise of Enterprise 2.0 is that valuable knowledge and contributions can come from anywhere in the organization. Unfortunately, there’s a perception that only knowledge workers stand to benefit from the social software revolution. As industry leader Dion Hinchcliffe noted:
The Enterprise 2.0 story is primarily aimed at knowledge workers engaged i But in the decisions and problems of customers every day. Small changes at first, perhaps anomalies, perhaps early trends. Either way, it’s the customers who will let you know when things are changing. n complex, collaborative projects which have had few effective software tools until recently, in other words strategic business activities.
Does that seem right? Only the knowledge workers have something to contribute in the emergent ethos that is social software? The reality is that knowledge workers have been participating while the rest of the company has been doing their own thing.
Where Will the First Indication of Market Changes Be Seen?
Market changes happen “out there”. Not in some paper you’re reading. In that case, who in the organization will hear about changes first? Likely, it will be those employees at the “edge” of the organization. Those with direct customer contact. Here’s a way to represent that:

The folks at the outer edge are the early radar. They’re hearing about new products customers are using. New requests for what your product should do. New use cases they are starting to have. This anecdote from 3M is instructive:
3M told a great innovation story at the ARF annual conference about a new product that started with a complaint call into customer care. The representative did his own research online, came up with a solution, filmed a video that he put on YouTube and re-contacted the customer to see if that is what he was looking for. 3M reaps the rewards of creating a culture where innovation can come from anyone and anywhere and giving employees a little breathing room to explore.
Everyone in a company has something to contribute. Employees are working in the trenches daily, and new ideas will occur regularly. They are ready to post these ideas and their knowledge. It just may not be via blogging or wikis.
Spectrum of Participation
There are a number of ways to contribute via social software. Some are well-suited to the work of knowledge workers. Others tap a wider range of participation inside companies:

At the top of the graph, applications like blogs, social bookmarks and wikis are the province of knowledge workers. People who research and record their findings. There is truth in the notion that even if only a few people participate in blogs, social bookmarking and wikis, there is high value for everyone. Finding the right information, and the right person, at the right time is valuable.
But at the same time, companies are limited in the value of they derive if they can’t capture the thoughts of all employees. As the 3M story about the customer service representative shows, valuable contributions can come from anywhere.
That’s why platforms that collect ideas are so valuable. The 1-9-90 rule of participation as it pertains to wikis and blogs is due in part to these two factors:
- Writing up things you already know takes time, and is outside the flow of your daily work
- Open, free-form venues can elicit a question of, “what do I write in here?”
But ideas are different. Ideas are things you’d want to change. Ideas are things that can make your job easier. Ideas are natural outcomes of doing the work you do every day. Ideas represent your personal creativity. If the frustrating part of a blog or wiki is, “what should I write?”, the frustrating part about ideas is, “how do I let people know about this?”
That’s something we’ve seen here at Spigit. Employees find it easy to post the ideas they have. They generally are “feeling” the reason for the idea – customer requests, repeated issues, reading the latest developments in their industries, etc. The Spigit platform does include blogs and wikis, which our customers’ employees do use. But the locus of activity is around ideas. People really do gravitate to discussions of “what’s next?” Of course, we’ve also built in incentives for participation as well: platform currency, personal reputation scores, privileges based on your personal reputation scores.
What the charts above communicate is this: true company-wide participation is entirely possible. And to garner the greatest benefits from Enterprise 2.0, companies need to achieve a good mix of internally- and externally-oriented workers. Because they’re looking at different things.
Read more of the author at http://blog.spigit.com/Blog/View?blogid=105&blogentryid=125
Related articles by Zemanta
- Social Networking for the Legal Profession – Shaping New Ways of Working (socialmediatoday.com)
- Enterprise 2.0 Free e-book (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Want to look behind the scenes of the E2.0 SUMMIT? Processes and all … (enterprise2open.com)
- New Social Software and Collaboration research (cmswatch.com)
- enterprise2open 06/05/2009 (enterprise2open.com)
- Contribute to key debates in Enterprise Social Software (cmswatch.com)
- Understanding the role of Enterprise 2.0 and moving towards a Social Business (fastforwardblog.com)
- Enterprise 2.0 – ConnectIn Fact Sheet (slideshare.net)
- The Future of Enterprise Computing and Collaboration by Alan Cohen (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Dion Hinchcliffe Enterprise 2.0 Conference Workshop – Part One (fastforwardblog.com)
- How Much Scale Is Needed in Enterprise 2.0 Employee Adoption? (bhc3.wordpress.com)
- Becoming An Open Enterprise: Five Lessons from Booz Allen Hamilton (readwriteweb.com)
Posted in CRM, Enterprise 2.0, Social Media, Web 2.0 and Information Technology,, Front Office and Customer Service Operations, Knowledge management, Performance management, Vision, visionaries, vision things, trends
Tags: Blown to Bits, Business, Change, CRM and Web 2.0, Enterprise 2.0, H Pritchett, Information Technology, Knowledge management, Knowledge worker, Matty Franklin, Service 2.0, Six Sigma, social, Social Enterprise, Social media, Social network, Technology, Trends, Vision, Ways of Seeing
What is Enterprise 2.0?
Posted by fredzimny
![]()
Related articles by Zemanta
- Enterprise 2.0 Free e-book (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Contribute to key debates in Enterprise Social Software (cmswatch.com)
- New Social Software and Collaboration research (cmswatch.com)
- Useful Differentiation – Enterprise Social Computing vs. Everyday Use of Social Networks (fastforwardblog.com)
- Enterprise 2.0 conference followup (beingpeterkim.com)
- How Much Scale Is Needed in Enterprise 2.0 Employee Adoption? (bhc3.wordpress.com)
- Putting Web 2.0 to Work (slideshare.net)
- Transition Strategies for Enterprise 2.0 Adoption is also about I (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
Posted in Links, Misc. & Tweets
Comments Off
Tags: Business, Change, Enterprise 2.0, Front Office and Customer Service, Operations, Social Enterprise, Social network, Transition, Trends, Ways of Seeing, Web 2.0
Brad Hinton on knowledge management measurement
Posted by fredzimny
Mr Hinton gives nice suggestions how to deal with the never ending quest for data by senior management to justify any action with regard to knowledge management activities. In my working field I always try to mention efficiency gains, increased effectively, more flexibility and innovation possibilities. Within each mention I distinguish first order (within a department), second order (related departments or organizations) and third order (not related order or organizations). I have to admit that I’m not always successful in my business justification, but who is….
http://bradhinton.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/on-knowledge-management-measurement Posted on June 29, 2009 by bradhinton
It’s a fact of life that senior management nearly always love to see facts and figures.
Facts and figures can be concise, are usually thought of as being objective, and provide decision makers with raw data from which to base decisions. Senior executives also claim they are time-poor and therefore only want to see just the facts, often in graphical or tabular form because they believe this information is easier to understand.
We therefore often have a problem conveying the full story of our work in knowledge management since we do not always have the facts and figures senior executives want.
We often provide information that is easy to collect but does not provide real meaning. The classic example is in using hit rates for intranet pages and web sites. High hit rates can often indicate confusion just as well as indicating purposeful traffic.
And, of course, facts and figures can be gamed. Work perfomance becomes artificially directed towards a narrow set of quantitative targets rather than the complete set of workplace activities and responsibilities. Narrow quantitative targets often stifle innovative thinking, limit team work, and inhibits building trust within organisations. Key performance indicators (KPI’s) are a classic case of turning targets into the target itself!
The other problem is that the outcome of a number of knowledge management processes and activities does not always show a direct linear relationship.
The beneficial outcome might come out of a series of interconnected relationships and serendipitous exchanges that take time to yield a distinct outcome on which to report. Social network analysis and knowledge mapping are techniques helpful here but they themselves take considerable time and analysis.
One strategy that I have used in the past is to provide the “raw data” in graphical form with an explanatory paragraph under each graph or chart. It is important to place the graphical representation of the data in some form of explanatory context. Hit rates and traffic numbers on communities of practice are not sufficient on their own.
The other pieces of “data” I provide are stories – narratives of things that have happened as a consequence of an action. This action might be closing a business deal based on information gleaned from a community of practice. It might be that getting that particular report on time meant that the final prepared document for management was more informed and better reflective of the contextual environment. Or it could mean that meeting the right person at the right time meant that the business plan had a greater chance of success. There are many outcomes that one can use.
The skill is in finding these examples and ensuring they represent the kinds of outcomes senior management want to hear and can understand. While I think any form of conversation that enhances our understanding and capacity to work more effectively is a good thing, others do not. Choose outcomes that are meaningful to the person or people you are reporting to.
But don’t stop there.
I would also include a story (or narrative fragment) that might not be directly related to a business outcome, but demonstrates a more intangible element. If the narrative fragment is interesting enough, it is surprising how much this sparks some interest to hear more. These “tell me more” instances don’t always happen, but when they do, they can be even more powerful demonstrations of knowledge management work that just the data.
In this regard, it is vital that the knowledge manager establish and maintain personal and visible relationships with people throughout the organisation. Scaleability can be enhanced through communication channels like the intranet, listservs, blogs, Twitter (if appropriate), and communities of practice. The knowledge manager must remain visible and be perceived to be an important gate keeper or lynch pin for people scattered throughout the organisation.
In reporting, I strongly recommend utilising both quantitative and qualitative information. If senior management have more meaning around the work of knowledge management, the better chance management will see the benefits.
Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)
Related articles by Zemanta
- How relevant are communities of practice in a network age? (socialmediatoday.com)
- Launching Social Networks for the Enterprise (fastforwardblog.com)
- What Twitter Needs to do for Personal Knowledge Management (fastforwardblog.com)
- Personal Knowledge Management Plan (knowledgefordevelopment.com)
- Project Management 2.0 (slideshare.net)
- Mike Gotta’s Reality 2.0: Getting Started with Enterprise Social Networking at Enterprise 2.0 Conference (fastforwardblog.com)
- Coming back soon with new thoughts (fredericmartin.typepad.com)
Read more at http://bradhinton.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/on-knowledge-management-measurement
Posted in CRM, Enterprise 2.0, Social Media, Web 2.0 and Information Technology,, Front Office and Customer Service Operations, Knowledge management, Performance management, Vision, visionaries, vision things, trends
Tags: brad hinton, Change, Community of practice, Key performance indicator, Knowledge management, Personal Productivity, Social network, Transition, Trends, Vision, Ways of Seeing
Oops, remarkable art is it not! Artist 06/29/2009
Posted by fredzimny
Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.
Posted in Links, Misc. & Tweets
Comments Off
Tags: Kristoffer Svenberg, Links, Photographer, Photography, Ways of Seeing
Transition Strategies for Enterprise 2.0 Adoption is also about I
Posted by fredzimny
In the middle of transition we can see the I. Transitions are about me on a personal and professional level. And indeed, if we use levels, humbleness is always on its place.
Found at http://www.intelligententerprise.com/blog/archives/2009/06/transition_stra.html
Posted by Sandy Kemsley
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
1:37 PM
At this week’s Enterprise 2.0 Conference in Boston, Lee Bryant of Headshift looked at the adoption challenges for 2.0 technologies in companies that have grown up around a centralized model of IT, particularly for the second wave adopters required to move Enterprise 2.0 into the mainstream within an organization. He points out that we can’t afford the high-friction, high-cost model of deploying technology and processes, but need to rebalance the role of people within the enterprise.
External tools are subject to evolutionary forces and either adapt or die quickly, whereas we are forced to put up with Paleolithic-era tools inside the enterprise because it’s a captive market. 21st century enterprises, however, aren’t putting up with that: they’re going outside and getting the best possible tools for their uses on demand, rather than waiting for IT to provide a second-rate solution, months or years later.
There is a shift from individual productivity to network productivity, that measures the improvements that occur because we’re doing things together and connected rather than as individuals. If everyone in the company has common goals, then there’s a big boost in productivity when people work together.
There’s a need to make hidden data visible and use it to drive collective intelligence — I see this all the time with the need for enterprise search and content management for static content, but also enterprise micro-blogging and other conversations that surface more transient ideas for consumption.
It’s all about improving processes and reducing the cost of doing business, although not necessarily in the structured BPM style of process improvement; instead, it’s about using social tools to change how people can collaborate and work together. This might include adding a social layer to existing tools, such as we see when collaboration is added to ECM and BPM but moving beyond that.
Read more at http://www.intelligententerprise.com/blog/archives/2009/06/transition_stra.html
Posted in CRM, Enterprise 2.0, Social Media, Web 2.0 and Information Technology,, Front Office and Customer Service Operations, Knowledge management, Performance management, Vision, visionaries, vision things, trends
Tags: Change, Collective intelligence, CRM and Web 2.0, Enterprise 2.0, Enterprise content management, Enterprise social software, Social media, Social network, Transition, Vision, Ways of Seeing
Remodelling the business of banksters: created concept circa conception crisis
Posted by fredzimny
I recently posted about scenarios for banks 2020. This powerpoint from the good old days just before the crisis (indeed summer 2007) gives a nice overview about possible ways how to structure banks and what is strategic within the prevaling banking concept.
Related articles by Zemanta
- What’s the Last Innovation We’ve Seen Coming out from the Banks? Scenarios for Banks in 2020? (futurelab.net)
- Five More Bank Failures Reported (shoppingblog.com)
- Zombie Banks Parody (randomthougts101.blogspot.com)
- What I Want from the Banks? – Tallberg Part Two (clearlyso.com)
- Blown to bits: Five More Banks Shut Down by the Feds (bizzia.com)
- Blown to bits: Three More Banks Fail – 40 in 2009 (bizzia.com)
- The World Finance Crisis & the American Mission (nybooks.com)
Posted in CRM, Enterprise 2.0, Social Media, Web 2.0 and Information Technology,, Front Office and Customer Service Operations, Knowledge management, Performance management, Recovery and the way out of the crisis, recession and depression, Vision, visionaries, vision things, trends
Tags: Bank, Banking Services, Blown to Bits, Business, Change, Crisis, Financial Services, Front Office and Customer Service, Making sense of leadership, Operations, Recession and Depression, Social media, Social network, Transition, Trends, Ways of Seeing
Michael Jackson Shrine
Posted by fredzimny
http://www.brooklynvegan.com/archives/2009/06/whats_going_on_648.html
Michael Jackson shrine in East Atlanta Village (Tessa Horehled)

Michael Jackson memorial in LA (ShawnLA77)

Michael Jackson memorial @ Motown in Detroit (miss ania k)

Michael Jackson’s childhood home in Indiana (bobcaroline)

http://www.brooklynvegan.com/archives/2009/06/whats_going_on_648.html
Related articles by Zemanta
- Tears And Fears: Fans Still Mourn For Jackson (news.sky.com)
- Michael Jackson blings up with 300,000 crystals (guardian.co.uk)
- Quotes from world of show business on Jackson death (ctv.ca)
- Remembering Michael Jackson’s Better Days (idiomag.com)
- Death of a Hero… Michael Jackson (cradleoffilth.com)
- News: More Rockers Comment On The Death Of Michael Jackson (idiomag.com)
- More Michael Jackson Tributes (idiomag.com)
- Michael Jackson Dead (idiomag.com)
- Michael Jackson Mourned In Gary, Indiana Hometown (huffingtonpost.com)

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=368c68dc-8bd9-49d1-a330-3ae87901628e)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=2762e8d4-fa75-4d45-9ef5-cc67be119491)

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=9a4ac036-e152-41a1-968c-a5fa9d408965)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=ba2958a9-9ddf-44c9-a4e8-57e217598091)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=06e779d6-71b9-415e-8045-736c76c9c03d)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=acbfcbb9-02ca-400d-a0b3-24702e4133ca)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=7d8bfb18-837f-4c2f-b3bf-25823a641439)