Monthly Archives: July 2009

Resolution for the yearplan 2010: Really Knowing What our Employees Think

On the road to nowhere we often see many resolutions. But if any operations, any department, any professional leader or manager aims to succeed feeling and knowing what employees is essential. This post reflects on that

Found at http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/baldoni/2009/07/do_you_really_know_what_your.html

9:54 AM Wednesday July 22, 2009

The Pew Research’s News Interest Index for a week in July concluded that people surveyed were actually more interested in stories about Michael Jackson‘s death, as well as the economy and health care reform, than news media‘s coverage provided.

With the glut of coverage and cries of overkill for these stories, this is a surprising revelation. The lesson for leaders? If you want to know what people are thinking, don’t rely on second-hand reports from others. Ask employees yourself and listen to what they have to say. Political campaigns are particularly expert in this area when they test market messages and conduct tracking polls. By measuring impact and understanding, they are able to shape and re-shape their messages for greater impact. (Some may call this pandering; others may regard it as responsiveness.)

Corporate leaders do not need to hire pollsters but they do need to be more cognizant of the impact of their messages. Most managers are very good at giving messages; following up with repeated iterations is more of a challenge, but a greater challenge is often gauging the effect of the message. We see this most evidently during organizational transformation efforts. There is a lot of energy and enthusiasm expended in getting the word out about the “big change” but relatively little follow up in terms of listening and evaluating impact. To address this, consider these suggestions when crafting your next communication plan.

Walk the halls. Make yourself visible to your team by spending time in their work areas. Be approachable so people can engage you in conversation. Be prepared to begin conversations about new product launches, service improvements, or efficiency initiatives. Ask people how these things are working for them.

Listen to feedback. Give them time to respond. Ask follow-up questions related to their experiences so you get beyond the seventh-grader’s answer to how are things at school — fine! When you hear such responses, people may be too timid to voice an honest answer. Be conversational to encourage folks to share more information.

Report on feedback. Let your colleagues know what you are hearing and what it means. For example, if you are discovering that customers hate the service upgrade, report on it. Likewise if employees are enthusiastic about an initiative, you can be heartened, but stay tuned for further updates. Many initiatives are well received, only to die later from lack of support.

Report on revisions. If you make a major change, or even a minor one, communicate it. Also, do more follow up to see how it is working. This is especially critical when there is initial resistance. Few things are more powerful than a senior executive saying, “we heard you and we are making changes.” That gives a leader instant credibility, as long as there is appropriate follow through.

Conduct a communications audit. Corporate leaders do not need to conduct tracking polls but communication audits around what people are thinking, feeling, and doing related to company initiatives can be useful. Such audits can be done quickly and cost effectively online. Again, report the results to everyone so you keep the organization up to date.

There is an additional point about the prevailing news coverage that is relevant to communicating in tough times. While economic news is generally bleak right now, there are periodic bits of good news, “green shoots” as pundits are fond of calling them. If those green shoots are related to your business, make certain you make a point of linking that good news to what your team does. Do not assume people will figure it out; connect the dots for them. For example, if you are in the alternative energy field, talk up federal funding as well as uptick in consumer awareness and corporate demand.

Leaders need to keep their fingers on the pulses of their organizations. Many executives fear being blindsided by what they do not know — like lack of capability, resources, manpower and talent that will affect business growth. Those executives who spend time out and about with their people have few such fears. They know the score and as a result, can steer their organizations with a greater sense of awareness.

Read more at http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/baldoni/2009/07/do_you_really_know_what_your.html

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Resolutions for the year plan 2010: Shared Services

Talking about enterprise 2.0 is discussing the concept  of collaboration, co-operation and communication. In this context I’m a huge fan of shared services. To boost quality, flexibility, innovation and costs.

And for my own department I surelywill look for possibilities the SSC context? Do you also consider it for your operations in 2010?

http://www.axiomgroupe.com/community/en/categoryblog/54-5-issues-about-shared-services.html

Written by Magdalena Szarafin Thursday, 23 July 2009 01:26

Issue 1: Expectations of companies from different reorganisation alternatives for the finance and controlling processes

Outsourcing:

  • Personnel cutback (56%),
  • Cost reduction (50%),
  • Focus on core business (43%)

Shared service center (SSC):

Centralisation:

  • Increase of information quality (82%),
  • Better information delivery (78%),
  • Reduction of coordination complexity (69%)

Source: Horváth & Partner „CFO-Studie 2007 Reorganisation im Finanzbereich”

Issue 2: Cost aspects

66% of companies expect 20-40% cost reduction as a result of shared service implementation.

Measures to cut costs:

  • Process standardization,
  • Personnel cost reduction,
  • Reduction of system / IT complexity
  • Use of location advantages

Source: BearingPoint „Finanzstudie” 2007 „Shared Service Center – Wertbeitrag und zukünftige Trends”

Issue 3: Advantages of an HR shared service center

Advantages of an HR shared service center:

  • Speed,
  • Entrepreneurial acting,
  • Lower error rates,
  • Higher customer focus

Typically HR SSC bunch similar processes from different areas in form of one internal centralized entity in order to achieve qualitative and quantitative advantages.

Source: Hewitt-Studie „HR Shared Service Centres in Deutschland 2008″

Issue 4: Shared services in UK further and higher education

The following findings from the research of shared services in further and higher education in the UK can be listed:

  • There is a low level of enthusiasm for shared services in the sector,
  • Adopting shared services carries risk with uncertain benefits, which are in any case dependent upon institutional circumstances,
  • The principal impetus for institutions towards shared services is the delivery of better services rather than towards being leaner organisations,
  • Partnership issues are the principal group of inhibitors hindering adoption of Shared Services,
  • There is considerable commonality in the approaches of FEIs and HEIs to the adoption of shared services.

Source: JISC Study of Shared Services in UK Further and Higher Education, September 2008

Issue 5: Shared services vs. outsourcing

59% of IT executives classify the perspectives of SSC as positive or very positive. 18% of them are sceptical about SSC. 40% of the study participants show advantages of SSC comparing with outsourcing. The main advantage of SSC vs. outsourcing is avoidance of dependency on a third party. Almost 2/3 of IT executives are of the opinion that SSC are an instrument to cut costs and increase performance.

Source: Infora-Studie: Shared Service Center attackieren das Outsourcing-Geschäft, 2008

Read more at http://www.axiomgroupe.com/community/en/categoryblog/54-5-issues-about-shared-services.html

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Resolutions for 2010: The Importance of Creating a Collaborative Enterprise (networks)

Artist Talia Chetrit http://www.taliachetrit.com

Artist Talia Chetrit http://www.taliachetrit.com

This found post stimulated my thinking for the preparation of the annual plan 2010. Not only cost, quality, flexibility are key drivers in the forthcoming year.  Innovation and collaboration are the new elements that may lead us out of the current crisis (which may also be a leadership crisis in many organizations).

In my analysis of the excellent text I missed one point. Collaboration will become more and more independent of organizational walls.  That’s why I added networks.

http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/19/the-importance-of-creating-a-collaborative-enterprise

Tammy Erickson July 19th, 2009

Today, the core challenge – and primary opportunity for value creation – is the utilization of complex knowledge formed through the contributions of many individuals and discrete events.

This requires creating a collaborative enterprise – an organization that is adept at bringing ideas and information together in new and useful ways.

The Twentieth Century business challenge was the mastery of scale and scope.

Organizations that mobilized productive effort at the best volume, cost and quality were the ones that dominated the economy.

To meet this challenge, organizations optimized around strong hierarchies and the division of responsibility.

Only top leaders were expected to worry about the overall goals, freeing workers to focus on performing the defined work. Strong units or “silos” formed, allowing each component skill to be developed to high levels of competency and providing excellent control through strict accountability. Frederick Taylor explicitly worked to remove knowledge from the daily production process and to center knowledge in a few managers and engineers. Value was maximized by making organizational behavior routine.

Over time, those value creation techniques themselves became routine – and lead to commodity models.

The skills remained necessary, but were not sufficient for success. For the past three decades, we have been slowly bringing knowledge back into our work:

  • Encouraging production workers to think about improvements
  • Encouraging sales people to take initiative and responsibility in dealing with customers
  • Learning and continually improving processes and routines

Now, the dominant challenge is one of mobilizing intelligence, harnessing the smallest units of insight, and leveraging specialists.

Organizations must encourage people to invest their discretionary effort – to use their particular knowledge and capacities in ways that continuously contribute to the success of the whole:

Achieving more flexible ways of combining different forms of knowledge and expertise to come up with something better than any single function could achieve

  • Tapping multiple experts to innovate faster
  • Responding to the market and environment more fluidly and effectively

These activities require collaboration.

Today’s constantly-evolving Web 2.0 technologies offer substantial advantages as we work to meet these challenges. They:

  • Bring people together and let them interact, without specifying how they should do so
  • Cause patterns and structure to appear over time
  • Offer significant improvements in generating, capturing, and sharing knowledge, letting people find helpful colleagues, tapping into new sources of innovation and expertise, and harnessing the “wisdom of crowds.”

My colleagues, in the research for Wikinomics, identified exciting examples of these new technologies in action creating new business models, including:

  • Peer-to-Peer Production – Applying open source principles to create products made of bits – from operating systems to encyclopedias
  • Open Platforms – Inviting participation of external partners to build new tools, leverage databases, or invent applications
  • Ideagoras – Giving companies access to a global marketplace of ideas and uniquely qualified minds to extend their problem-solving capacity, and
  • Prosumer Communities – Giving customers the tools they need to participate in value creation.

The examples in Wikinomics – many of them unique and compelling examples of new companies – illustrate what the science fiction writer William Gibson has said: “The future is already here—it’s just not evenly distributed.”

But the advantages of Web 2.0 are not confined to “new economy” companies, nor to those full of Gen Y workers.

The business use and resulting benefits of the new tools of collaboration are available to any organization – even the most traditionally hierarchical and siloed. As Andy McAfee writes in his upcoming book, Enterprise 2.0: New Collaborative Tools for Your Organization’s Toughest Challenges, due out this fall, “the story of how businesses use technology is about to become a lot more interesting.”

The key for all organizations is to reframe collaboration not as something to do in addition to other priorities – but as a fundamental way to address all business priorities. There is little on any corporate agenda today that will not benefit from mobilizing people with widely diverse skills and views to work together effectively. This capability is:

  • The key to successful innovation – bringing ideas together that have never before been combined
  • The core opportunity for re-thinking obsolete business models
  • An essential element of employee engagement – creating commitment and stimulating discretionary effort
  • A powerful tool for strengthening the customer experience and your brand presence
  • New possibilities for continued efficiency through shared learning and new approaches.

Granted, shifting to collaboration can be difficult. Reshaping a hierarchical organization into a collaborative enterprise goes against the grain of five centuries of Western tradition. It requires that we move yet further away from cultures based on loyalty, reciprocated with protection and care, and that we give us the notion of individual autonomy. It will mean accepting performance-based arrangements and recognizing our mutual interdependence.

Collaboration asks individuals to step up to a higher and more complicated level of contribution than was necessary in a hierarchy. It challenges us to interact with peers in new and unfamiliar ways – negotiating directly rather than running to a boss for protection or arbitration; dealing with rich content that flows through infinite links.

But the business opportunity presented by collaboration is substantial, in part, because it is difficult. Mastering collaboration presents the opportunity for significant competitive advantage. Old approaches (scope, scale, cost), although always important, add little value. As technology enables a very different level of performance, smart competition will shift the playing field. This train is leaving the station.

As recently as six months ago, the question may have been how best to “manage collaborative technologies” – how to experiment with interesting new applications inside a traditional organizational design.

Today, the bar rising.

Today is about managing the enterprise collaboratively – solving business problems through collaboration – achieving business outcomes through collaboration.

Don’t get left standing on the platform.

http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/19/the-importance-of-creating-a-collaborative-enterprise

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Resolutions for 2010: accomplishing personal change

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

let’s dance on thurston moore’s 51th birthday

Considerations for your annual plan 2010: How Social Media is Transforming Customer Service and the Customer Experience

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

A resolution for your annual plan 2010: a social customer care plan

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 52 other followers