Monthly Archives: October 2009

Some of Isabelle O’Kane’s key thoughts coming out of PICNIC innovation festival Amsterdam 2009

Picnic09 My Key Learnings

Some of my key thoughts coming out of PICNIC innovation festival here in Amsterdam

Supporting Stiglitz and Sen’s Manifesto on Measuring Economic Performance and Social Progress

Found at http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/010627.html


Hassan Masum, 15 Oct 09
badrobotcompassimg_0389_u470.jpg A recent report commissioned by the French government (mentioned previously on WorldChanging) foreshadows why and how GDP should be supplemented as the de facto measure of progress.

The authors are world-class – Joseph Stiglitz was the chair, advised by Amartya Sen. Commission members included Nobelists and creative thinkers Kenneth Arrow and Daniel Kahneman, Nick Stern of Stern Review fame, and Robert D. Putnam.

We went through a phase transition a few years back, when the conversational zeitgeist moved from "is climate change really happening?" to "what do we do about climate change?" In the same way, the challenge is shifting from "is GDP good enough?" to how to implement broader measures of progress in our economies and political systems. This suggests questions like: Who are the early adopters? How will particular measures advance different social goals? What are the simplest useful advances to make?

In the edited highlights below, Stiglitz, Sen, and their companions weigh in with their perspectives and recommendations.

Key Messages

The seemingly bright growth performance of the world economy between 2004 and 2007 may have been achieved at the expense of future growth. It is also clear that some of the performance was a “mirage”, profits that were based on prices that had been inflated by a bubble.

The whole Commission is convinced that the crisis is teaching us a very important lesson: those attempting to guide the economy and our societies are like pilots trying to steering a course without a reliable compass. The decisions they (and we as individual citizens) make depend on what we measure, how good our measurements are and how well our measures are understood. We are almost blind when the metrics on which action is based are ill-designed or when they are not well understood. For many purposes, we need better metrics. Fortunately, research in recent years has enabled us to improve our metrics, and it is time to incorporate in our measurement systems some of these advances.

The first main message of our report is that the time has come to adapt our system of measurement of economic activity. There are now many products whose quality is complex, multi-dimensional and subject to rapid change. This is obvious for goods, like cars, computers, washing machines and the like, but is even truer for services, such as medical services, educational services, information and communication technologies, research activities and financial services. Capturing quality change is a tremendous challenge, yet this is vital to measuring real income and real consumption, some of the key determinants of people’s material well-being.

Another key message, and unifying theme of the report, is that the time is ripe for our measurement system to shift emphasis from measuring economic production to measuring people’s well-being. Changing emphasis does not mean dismissing GDP and production measures. They emerged from concerns about market production and employment; they continue to provide answers to many important questions such as monitoring economic activity. But emphasizing well-being is important because there appears to be an increasing gap between the information contained in aggregate GDP data and what counts for common people’s well-being.

To define what well-being means, a multidimensional definition has to be used. Based on academic research and a number of concrete initiatives developed around the world, the Commission has identified the following key dimensions that should be taken into account. At least in principle, these dimensions should be considered simultaneously:

i. Material living standards (income, consumption and wealth);
ii. Health;
iii. Education;
iv. Personal activities including work
v. Political voice and governance;
vi. Social connections and relationships;
vii. Environment (present and future conditions);
viii. Insecurity, of an economic as well as a physical nature.

All these dimensions shape people’s well-being, and yet many of them are missed by conventional income measures.

Recommendations

To be continued at http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/010627.html

Reading “Getting Started with Disruptive Business Design” by John Sviokla @HarvardBusiness.org

Found at http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/sviokla/2009/10/getting_started_with_disruptiv.html

10:20 AM Monday October 19, 2009

Oliver Yeh, a first-year Mechanical Engineering student at MIT, just successfully designed, launched and retrieved a camera 17.5 miles into the atmosphere and took 4,000 photos — at a cost of just $150.00! That’s probably less money than he will spend on his celebratory dinner.

Not only is this story inspirational to someone like me, who after millions and millions of miles in the air (no exaggeration) still sits glued to the window when I fly over Manhattan or the Grand Canyon, but it points out how the minimum efficient scale of doing fantastic things is getting orders of magnitude lower in some industries. This lower cost of entry can be magnified and accelerated when you have someone come to the design problem with an entirely new set of expectations.

Craig Newmark’s Craig’s List is estimated to have about $100,000,000 in revenue — with 30 employees. That’s $3.3 million per employee, and even if it costs $70,000,000 to run it (which it can’t), that’s a profit-per-employee of $1,000,000. (Compare that with Amazon’s profit-per-employee of approximately $30,000.) His model is so disruptive because he gives away all the ads except those for jobs, thereby turning what was once newspaper profits into what economists know as consumer surplus.

Now, there’s been a lot of interest in “disruption” ever since Clay Christensen did his pathbreaking work on The Innovator’s Dilemma, which chronicled how incumbent companies were upended by competitors or substitutes who arose from “lower” markets to create a new cost and demand base. Southwest Airlines did it in air travel, and Wal-Mart in retail. You know the story.

So what is the toolkit to create a disruptive design? Here are some ideas:

1. Simultaneously simplify a number of advantages together to create a new cost base.
When Southwest Airlines launched they flew only one aircraft — the Boeing 737. Today, they still have one aircraft. They have one class of service. They have simple fare strucutures. They sell direct to end customers. They go to the less frequented, second-tier airports. They have broad job descriptions and cross-train so that one person can do many jobs — including pilots handling luggage. The created radical simplicity by simplifying many dimensions. They are not the only business where complexity has stopped adding value. New, radically simple business models can be created in everything from financial services to healthcare.

2. Give away the other guy’s razor! Craig Newmark garnered dominant market share by giving away almost all the blades. Put more formally, every “two-sided market” has a vulnerability — and if you can enter by aiming at that vulnerability, you can win. In China, Google is now giving away MP3′s and sharing the ad revenue with the artists. Paid music is now all marketing promotion. In addition, at Wired magazine’s Disruptive by Design conference, a featured book was Chris Anderson’s Free.

3. Look for new, radically cheaper ways to do the job. Yeh used run-of-the-mill technology — cell phones, video cameras, and even a styrofoam cooler — to create a much cheaper design. Consumer technologies and on-demand services like Amazon’s Mechanical Turk enable new business designs that could have a fraction of the cost to deliver the same services. Imagine a security company that was truly designed around the inexpensive, internet connected, monitoring equipment available today.

4. Think about leveraging a very few individuals with extraordinary talent. It is possible today for a small group of people to make a spectacular movie (think Pixar) or to manage billions in capital (think hedge-funds). Is there a way to create incredible value for your organization by leveraging the power of a small group across millions of consumers or billions of dollars?

One good way to get at these disruptive designs is to do what we at my firm call a “Fiercest Competitor Workshop,” which starts with the premise that you have been fired from your old organization but you have access to ample capital and talent. Your task is to design the fiercest competitor that could take the market from your old firm. In my experience when running these workshops, it takes people about an hour to get out of their old mindset — but when they do, they often design the most wonderfully dangerous potential competitors. No one knows their company’s vulnerability to a disruptive design better than their own employees.

It is the leader’s job to unlock this disruptive design potential so that it can be harnessed to help the incumbent make more money for its current shareholders, employees, and provide better surplus value to customers.

Read more at http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/sviokla/2009/10/getting_started_with_disruptiv.html

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Checking out: Change by design with Tim Brown

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Looking at the remarkable artefacts of Stanislav Ginzburg!

Found at http://www.featureshoot.com/2009/08/stanislav-ginzburg-new-york

by Alison Zavos

Stanislav Ginzburg

Stanislav Ginzburg was born and raised in Orenburg, Russia. He immigrated to the US at the age of 15 where he later received his BFA in Photography from Parsons School of Design. His work has been included in several group shows at the Brooklyn Museum of Art, Deitch Projects, NY Studio Gallery, and other venues. His latest project, Tales from Vienna Woods, was on view at Peter Hay Halpert Fine Art gallery in NYC last summer. This work represents a dark and ominous exploration of a mythical forest which serves as a playground for artist’s imagination and solemn narrative vignettes. Stanislav currently lives and works in Brooklyn, NY.

Stanislav Ginzburg1

Stanislav Ginzburg5

Stanislav Ginzburg4

See more at http://www.featureshoot.com/2009/08/stanislav-ginzburg-new-york

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Checking out The 50 Most Influential Management Gurus as from Forbes.com

http://www.forbes.com/2009/10/13/influential-business-thinkers-leadership-thought-leaders-chart.html

Klaus Kneale, 10.14.09, 03:00 AM EDT

Leadership consulting firm CrainerDearlove surveyed 3,500 people and a panel of experts to determine the 2009 edition of the Thinkers 50, a biennial list of the most influential living management thinkers.

For more about the list, see “The Most Influential Business Thinkers.”

ank Name 2007 Rank Country Day Job
1 C.K. Prahalad 1 India/U.S. University of Michigan Academic
2 Malcolm Gladwell 18 Canada New Yorker Columnist
3 Paul Krugman - U.S. Princeton Academic
4 Steve Jobs 29 U.S. CEO of Apple
5 W. Chan Kim & Renée Mauborgne 6 Korea/U.S. Insead Academics
6 Muhammad Yunus - Bangladesh Founder of Grameen Bank, Economist
7 Bill Gates 2 U.S. Founder of Microsoft, Philanthropist
8 Richard Branson 9 U.K. Founder of Virgin, Entrepreneur
9 Philip Kotler 11 U.S. Northwestern University Academic
10 Gary Hamel 5 U.S. Co-founder Mlab, Consultant
11 Michael Porter 4 U.S. Harvard Academic
12 Ratan Tata - India Chairman of Tata
13 Ram Charan 22 India Executive Coach
14 Marshall Goldsmith 34 U.S. Executive Coach
15 S.Kris Gopalakrishnan - India Co-founder and CEO of Infosys
16 Howard Gardner 39 U.S. Harvard Academic
17 Jim Collins 10 U.S. Consultant
18 Lynda Gratton 19 U.K. London Business School Academic
19 Tom Peters 7 U.S. Consultant
20 Jack Welch 8 U.S. Retired Executive
21 Eric Schmidt - U.S. CEO of Google
22 Joseph Stiglitz - U.S. Columbia Academic
23 Kjell Nordstrom & Jonas Ridderstrale 13 Sweden Speakers and Academics
24 Vijay Govindarajan 23 India/U.S. Academic in Residence for GE
25 Marcus Buckingham 38 U.K. Speaker
26 Richard D’Aveni 46 U.S. Dartmouth Academic
27 Rosabeth Moss Kanter 28 U.S. Harvard Academic
28 Clayton Christensen 25 U.S. Harvard Academic
29 Stephen Covey 15 U.S. Speaker and Author
30 Thomas Friedman 26 U.S. New York Times Columnist
31 David Ulrich 42 U.S. University of Michigan Academic
32 Roger Martin - Canada Dean of University of Toronto Rotman School
33 Henry Mintzberg 16 Canada McGill Academic
34 Daniel Goleman 37 U.S. Author and Consultant
35 Chris Anderson - U.S. Wired Editor-in-chief
36 Warren Bennis 24 U.S. University of Southern California Academic
37 Robert Kaplan & David Norton 12 U.S. Consultants
38 Jeff Immelt 31 U.S. CEO of General Electric
39 Don Tapscott - Canada Consultant
40 Nassim Taleb - Lebanon Academic
41 John Kotter 30 U.S. Harvard Academic
42 Niall Ferguson - U.K. Harvard and Oxford Academic
43 Charles Handy 14 Ireland Author
44 Rakesh Khurana 45 India/U.S. Harvard Academic
45 Manfred Kets De Vries - Holland Insead Academic
46 Tammy Erickson - U.S. Author and Consultant
47 Costas Markides 44 Cyprus London Business School Academic
48 Barbara Kellerman - U.S. Harvard Academic
49 Rob Goffee & Gareth Jones 32 U.K. Academics
50 Jimmy Wales - U.S. Co-founder of Wikipedia

Source: CrainerDearlove, www.crainerdearlove.com.

Read more from http://www.forbes.com/2009/10/13/influential-business-thinkers-leadership-thought-leaders-chart.html

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

John Gerzema reflecting about the post crisis consumer @TED

John Gerzema says there’s an upside to the recent financial crisis — the opportunity for positive change. Speaking at TEDxKC, he identifies four major cultural shifts driving ne…

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 52 other followers