Stanislav Ginzburg was born and raised in Orenburg, Russia. He immigrated to the US at the age of 15 where he later received his BFA in Photography from Parsons School of Design. His work has been included in several group shows at the Brooklyn Museum of Art, Deitch Projects, NY Studio Gallery, and other venues. His latest project, Tales from Vienna Woods, was on view at Peter Hay Halpert Fine Art gallery in NYC last summer. This work represents a dark and ominous exploration of a mythical forest which serves as a playground for artist’s imagination and solemn narrative vignettes. Stanislav currently lives and works in Brooklyn, NY.
Monthly Archives: October 2009
Supporting Stiglitz and Sen’s Manifesto on Measuring Economic Performance and Social Progress
Found at http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/010627.html
A recent report commissioned by the French government (mentioned previously on WorldChanging) foreshadows why and how GDP should be supplemented as the de facto measure of progress.
The authors are world-class – Joseph Stiglitz was the chair, advised by Amartya Sen. Commission members included Nobelists and creative thinkers Kenneth Arrow and Daniel Kahneman, Nick Stern of Stern Review fame, and Robert D. Putnam.
We went through a phase transition a few years back, when the conversational zeitgeist moved from "is climate change really happening?" to "what do we do about climate change?" In the same way, the challenge is shifting from "is GDP good enough?" to how to implement broader measures of progress in our economies and political systems. This suggests questions like: Who are the early adopters? How will particular measures advance different social goals? What are the simplest useful advances to make?
In the edited highlights below, Stiglitz, Sen, and their companions weigh in with their perspectives and recommendations.
Key Messages
The seemingly bright growth performance of the world economy between 2004 and 2007 may have been achieved at the expense of future growth. It is also clear that some of the performance was a “mirage”, profits that were based on prices that had been inflated by a bubble.
The whole Commission is convinced that the crisis is teaching us a very important lesson: those attempting to guide the economy and our societies are like pilots trying to steering a course without a reliable compass. The decisions they (and we as individual citizens) make depend on what we measure, how good our measurements are and how well our measures are understood. We are almost blind when the metrics on which action is based are ill-designed or when they are not well understood. For many purposes, we need better metrics. Fortunately, research in recent years has enabled us to improve our metrics, and it is time to incorporate in our measurement systems some of these advances.
The first main message of our report is that the time has come to adapt our system of measurement of economic activity. There are now many products whose quality is complex, multi-dimensional and subject to rapid change. This is obvious for goods, like cars, computers, washing machines and the like, but is even truer for services, such as medical services, educational services, information and communication technologies, research activities and financial services. Capturing quality change is a tremendous challenge, yet this is vital to measuring real income and real consumption, some of the key determinants of people’s material well-being.
Another key message, and unifying theme of the report, is that the time is ripe for our measurement system to shift emphasis from measuring economic production to measuring people’s well-being. Changing emphasis does not mean dismissing GDP and production measures. They emerged from concerns about market production and employment; they continue to provide answers to many important questions such as monitoring economic activity. But emphasizing well-being is important because there appears to be an increasing gap between the information contained in aggregate GDP data and what counts for common people’s well-being.
To define what well-being means, a multidimensional definition has to be used. Based on academic research and a number of concrete initiatives developed around the world, the Commission has identified the following key dimensions that should be taken into account. At least in principle, these dimensions should be considered simultaneously:
i. Material living standards (income, consumption and wealth);
ii. Health;
iii. Education;
iv. Personal activities including work
v. Political voice and governance;
vi. Social connections and relationships;
vii. Environment (present and future conditions);
viii. Insecurity, of an economic as well as a physical nature.
All these dimensions shape people’s well-being, and yet many of them are missed by conventional income measures.
Recommendations
To be continued at http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/010627.html
Reading “Getting Started with Disruptive Business Design” by John Sviokla @HarvardBusiness.org
Found at http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/sviokla/2009/10/getting_started_with_disruptiv.html
10:20 AM Monday October 19, 2009
Oliver Yeh, a first-year Mechanical Engineering student at MIT, just successfully designed, launched and retrieved a camera 17.5 miles into the atmosphere and took 4,000 photos — at a cost of just $150.00! That’s probably less money than he will spend on his celebratory dinner.
Not only is this story inspirational to someone like me, who after millions and millions of miles in the air (no exaggeration) still sits glued to the window when I fly over Manhattan or the Grand Canyon, but it points out how the minimum efficient scale of doing fantastic things is getting orders of magnitude lower in some industries. This lower cost of entry can be magnified and accelerated when you have someone come to the design problem with an entirely new set of expectations.
Craig Newmark’s Craig’s List is estimated to have about $100,000,000 in revenue — with 30 employees. That’s $3.3 million per employee, and even if it costs $70,000,000 to run it (which it can’t), that’s a profit-per-employee of $1,000,000. (Compare that with Amazon’s profit-per-employee of approximately $30,000.) His model is so disruptive because he gives away all the ads except those for jobs, thereby turning what was once newspaper profits into what economists know as consumer surplus.
Now, there’s been a lot of interest in “disruption” ever since Clay Christensen did his pathbreaking work on The Innovator’s Dilemma, which chronicled how incumbent companies were upended by competitors or substitutes who arose from “lower” markets to create a new cost and demand base. Southwest Airlines did it in air travel, and Wal-Mart in retail. You know the story.
So what is the toolkit to create a disruptive design? Here are some ideas:
1. Simultaneously simplify a number of advantages together to create a new cost base. When Southwest Airlines launched they flew only one aircraft — the Boeing 737. Today, they still have one aircraft. They have one class of service. They have simple fare strucutures. They sell direct to end customers. They go to the less frequented, second-tier airports. They have broad job descriptions and cross-train so that one person can do many jobs — including pilots handling luggage. The created radical simplicity by simplifying many dimensions. They are not the only business where complexity has stopped adding value. New, radically simple business models can be created in everything from financial services to healthcare.
2. Give away the other guy’s razor! Craig Newmark garnered dominant market share by giving away almost all the blades. Put more formally, every “two-sided market” has a vulnerability — and if you can enter by aiming at that vulnerability, you can win. In China, Google is now giving away MP3′s and sharing the ad revenue with the artists. Paid music is now all marketing promotion. In addition, at Wired magazine’s Disruptive by Design conference, a featured book was Chris Anderson’s Free.
3. Look for new, radically cheaper ways to do the job. Yeh used run-of-the-mill technology — cell phones, video cameras, and even a styrofoam cooler — to create a much cheaper design. Consumer technologies and on-demand services like Amazon’s Mechanical Turk enable new business designs that could have a fraction of the cost to deliver the same services. Imagine a security company that was truly designed around the inexpensive, internet connected, monitoring equipment available today.
4. Think about leveraging a very few individuals with extraordinary talent. It is possible today for a small group of people to make a spectacular movie (think Pixar) or to manage billions in capital (think hedge-funds). Is there a way to create incredible value for your organization by leveraging the power of a small group across millions of consumers or billions of dollars?
One good way to get at these disruptive designs is to do what we at my firm call a “Fiercest Competitor Workshop,” which starts with the premise that you have been fired from your old organization but you have access to ample capital and talent. Your task is to design the fiercest competitor that could take the market from your old firm. In my experience when running these workshops, it takes people about an hour to get out of their old mindset — but when they do, they often design the most wonderfully dangerous potential competitors. No one knows their company’s vulnerability to a disruptive design better than their own employees.
It is the leader’s job to unlock this disruptive design potential so that it can be harnessed to help the incumbent make more money for its current shareholders, employees, and provide better surplus value to customers.
Read more at http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/sviokla/2009/10/getting_started_with_disruptiv.html
Related articles by Zemanta
- Agreeing with Duffy’s POV: Demystifying Design: An Argument for Simplicity (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Why Design Thinking Won’t Save You – Peter Merholz – HarvardBusiness.org (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- David Armano Revisited Social Business by Design (already a classic) (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Checking out Tim Ferriss’ How to Blog without Killing Yourself (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Outsourcing Isn’t a Problem for Silicon Valley But Is for Detroit (blogs.harvardbusiness.org)
- Peter Kim @ Enterprise 2.0, Social Media Marketing, and Social Business Design (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Enterprise 2.0 – an evolution or revolution of the organisation (enterprise2open.com)
- Achieving adoption of a disruptive product (90percentofeverything.com)
Checking out: Change by design with Tim Brown
Related articles by Zemanta
- Agreeing with Duffy’s POV: Demystifying Design: An Argument for Simplicity (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Why Design Thinking Won’t Save You – Peter Merholz – HarvardBusiness.org (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- John Gerzema reflecting about the post crisis consumer @TED (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Getting Started with Disruptive Business Design (blogs.harvardbusiness.org)
- Good Design is still about Doing Good Work (designsojourn.com)
- “Design-Driven Innovation”-the powerful advantage that comes from changing the meaning of a product (futurelab.net)
- The Shape of Things to Come (online.wsj.com)
- Shop Talk Podcast: Roberto Verganti on “Design-Driven Innovation” (thecustomercollective.com)
- “Design-Driven Innovation” – the powerful advantage that comes from changing the meaning of a product (thecustomercollective.com)
- Design Driven Innovation (about Robert Verganti’s book) (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- A Movement for Meaning-Driven Business? (designmind.frogdesign.com)
- The delight in using an innovation you had a hand in creating (myventurepad.com)
Looking at the remarkable artefacts of Stanislav Ginzburg!
Found at http://www.featureshoot.com/2009/08/stanislav-ginzburg-new-york
See more at http://www.featureshoot.com/2009/08/stanislav-ginzburg-new-york
Related articles by Zemanta
- Looking at the artefacts of Michael G. Magin (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Looking at the artefacts of JeongMee Yoon (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Looking at the artefacts of Margriet Smulders (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Looking at the artefacts of Massimo Vitali, Lucca, Italy (and Giro di Lombardia) (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Looking at the artefacts of Yann Faucher (or the only girl in France that looks like U) (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Looking at the artefacts of Anastasia Cazabon Arts and facts (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Oops, remarkable artefacts from Nicolas Hughes & Arsenjev Kirill! Art and facts 09/01/2009 (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Oops, remarkable artefacts of Branislav Kropilak! Arts and facts 09/06/2009 (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Looking at the artefacts of Zhang Xiao (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
Checking out The 50 Most Influential Management Gurus as from Forbes.com
http://www.forbes.com/2009/10/13/influential-business-thinkers-leadership-thought-leaders-chart.html
Klaus Kneale, 10.14.09, 03:00 AM EDT
Leadership consulting firm CrainerDearlove surveyed 3,500 people and a panel of experts to determine the 2009 edition of the Thinkers 50, a biennial list of the most influential living management thinkers.
For more about the list, see “The Most Influential Business Thinkers.”
| ank | Name | 2007 Rank | Country | Day Job |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C.K. Prahalad | 1 | India/U.S. | University of Michigan Academic |
| 2 | Malcolm Gladwell | 18 | Canada | New Yorker Columnist |
| 3 | Paul Krugman | - | U.S. | Princeton Academic |
| 4 | Steve Jobs | 29 | U.S. | CEO of Apple |
| 5 | W. Chan Kim & Renée Mauborgne | 6 | Korea/U.S. | Insead Academics |
| 6 | Muhammad Yunus | - | Bangladesh | Founder of Grameen Bank, Economist |
| 7 | Bill Gates | 2 | U.S. | Founder of Microsoft, Philanthropist |
| 8 | Richard Branson | 9 | U.K. | Founder of Virgin, Entrepreneur |
| 9 | Philip Kotler | 11 | U.S. | Northwestern University Academic |
| 10 | Gary Hamel | 5 | U.S. | Co-founder Mlab, Consultant |
| 11 | Michael Porter | 4 | U.S. | Harvard Academic |
| 12 | Ratan Tata | - | India | Chairman of Tata |
| 13 | Ram Charan | 22 | India | Executive Coach |
| 14 | Marshall Goldsmith | 34 | U.S. | Executive Coach |
| 15 | S.Kris Gopalakrishnan | - | India | Co-founder and CEO of Infosys |
| 16 | Howard Gardner | 39 | U.S. | Harvard Academic |
| 17 | Jim Collins | 10 | U.S. | Consultant |
| 18 | Lynda Gratton | 19 | U.K. | London Business School Academic |
| 19 | Tom Peters | 7 | U.S. | Consultant |
| 20 | Jack Welch | 8 | U.S. | Retired Executive |
| 21 | Eric Schmidt | - | U.S. | CEO of Google |
| 22 | Joseph Stiglitz | - | U.S. | Columbia Academic |
| 23 | Kjell Nordstrom & Jonas Ridderstrale | 13 | Sweden | Speakers and Academics |
| 24 | Vijay Govindarajan | 23 | India/U.S. | Academic in Residence for GE |
| 25 | Marcus Buckingham | 38 | U.K. | Speaker |
| 26 | Richard D’Aveni | 46 | U.S. | Dartmouth Academic |
| 27 | Rosabeth Moss Kanter | 28 | U.S. | Harvard Academic |
| 28 | Clayton Christensen | 25 | U.S. | Harvard Academic |
| 29 | Stephen Covey | 15 | U.S. | Speaker and Author |
| 30 | Thomas Friedman | 26 | U.S. | New York Times Columnist |
| 31 | David Ulrich | 42 | U.S. | University of Michigan Academic |
| 32 | Roger Martin | - | Canada | Dean of University of Toronto Rotman School |
| 33 | Henry Mintzberg | 16 | Canada | McGill Academic |
| 34 | Daniel Goleman | 37 | U.S. | Author and Consultant |
| 35 | Chris Anderson | - | U.S. | Wired Editor-in-chief |
| 36 | Warren Bennis | 24 | U.S. | University of Southern California Academic |
| 37 | Robert Kaplan & David Norton | 12 | U.S. | Consultants |
| 38 | Jeff Immelt | 31 | U.S. | CEO of General Electric |
| 39 | Don Tapscott | - | Canada | Consultant |
| 40 | Nassim Taleb | - | Lebanon | Academic |
| 41 | John Kotter | 30 | U.S. | Harvard Academic |
| 42 | Niall Ferguson | - | U.K. | Harvard and Oxford Academic |
| 43 | Charles Handy | 14 | Ireland | Author |
| 44 | Rakesh Khurana | 45 | India/U.S. | Harvard Academic |
| 45 | Manfred Kets De Vries | - | Holland | Insead Academic |
| 46 | Tammy Erickson | - | U.S. | Author and Consultant |
| 47 | Costas Markides | 44 | Cyprus | London Business School Academic |
| 48 | Barbara Kellerman | - | U.S. | Harvard Academic |
| 49 | Rob Goffee & Gareth Jones | 32 | U.K. | Academics |
| 50 | Jimmy Wales | - | U.S. | Co-founder of Wikipedia |
Source: CrainerDearlove, www.crainerdearlove.com.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Why Design Thinking Won’t Save You – Peter Merholz – HarvardBusiness.org (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- Drucker at 100: What Will You Do Differently on Monday? (blogs.harvardbusiness.org)
- 3 Ways to Pitch Yourself in 30 Seconds (blogs.harvardbusiness.org)
- Resolutions for 201X: Bruce Sterling’s scenario’s for the future (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- LeadershipNow 140: August 2009 Compilation (leadershipnow.com)
- Real Leaders Can Tell You About It (myventurepad.com)
John Gerzema reflecting about the post crisis consumer @TED
John Gerzema says there’s an upside to the recent financial crisis — the opportunity for positive change. Speaking at TEDxKC, he identifies four major cultural shifts driving ne…
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=270fb27c-516a-4915-8e4c-42038fa4c3b8)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=87a5587e-6114-4edb-b0e1-93064e0541c1)




![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=31d3e3c9-8fcf-4bc2-8ca6-e0be9c613147)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=e4338738-f784-4c07-8955-b6f1c43fa524)